Fantastic work! I hope that I.D., M.A.F., G.O.D. and others go through this line by line, stating where they agree or disagree and WHY! But I will not hold my breath waiting…
Hi Ross, thanks so much! They’ll read it no doubt and avoid responding the same way they assiduously avoid truth in their posts.
I did link to Ailing-O-Loch-Clan’s profile … in the first paragraph! Hehe.
Miriam Sloboda-Finch has no respect for her readers that’s why she turned off open comments. She avoids all reality.
Hughes should throw himself on Davis’ imaginary Gladius sword vector on the front of Davis’ ‘book’, for turning one post into 6 parts digital ambien and 2 parts word salad midazolam.
Excellent work again - links to external sites are very thorough as well!
Please could you check the link to either “Resiliant cities” or “Strong cities” - the “geosites” one - as I think that it may have become truncated in the publishing process?
I saw the Aisling link - fantastic!
MAF (or MASF or MSF) did not reply to me when I emailed about gematria - switching off comments therefore is no surprise. Switching-off comments could be used as a tactic to block trolls. Although screaming “trolls are attacking me” can also be an evasion tactic.
The wellaware site is a good one: I wonder what happened to Dallasgoldbug, as his output has fallen off?
Some of those mentioned are part of the “puff of smoke” entrance phenomenon: you’ve never heard of them, then all of a sudden they are on the Delingpod with a book, buymeacoffee page and similar.
Hi Ross, thanks so much for alerting me about the link. I’ll fix it asap.
I can’t add or modify links directly in substack, I had to figure out a way to create an external document first, with embedded links, then copy paste those here. And in the process of my endless edits, I may have messed up that link. So thank you for telling me. Much appreciated.
Indeed. MASB is quite evasive on many subjects and deliberately so.
The cartel-cult members do not want certain topics discussed so they refuse to touch them, and only mention them in the most banal and superficial way.
It’s fascinating (congrats!) that you were the cause of Miri turning off her comments. Did you notice she called those who criticize her or ask questions “sub-stalkers”?
Frankly, I think she just can’t handle any heat whatsoever because she has a lot to hide. She’s far from the persona she projects. I mean, Miri promotes Henry Makow.
Anyone following Makow is falling into the ‘Jew psyop’ trap which is, of course, what the Jesuits and Catholic orders promote endlessly through their agents as a ‘divide et Impera’ tool.
I’m not sure that I can claim credit for that. I tried posting a comment on her website article - I’m not sure that she had a substack back then - that was not allowed, so I emailed and no response!
The money and banking system is one topic that they all tend to avoid - except when it is in the Jesuit/Catholic psy-op way!
Edit: PS Come to think of it Delingpole made his comments and articles ‘paid only’ shortly after I was discussing the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Hope Not Hate and money and how they were subtley working with right-wing think tanks that one would think they outh to be opposed to. And, it was also shortly after I did a lot of George Orwell, 1984 and gematria in one of the comments on his article, which received no response.
Interesting! Delingpole is a fascinating Oxbridge type, hunt club, silly ‘character’.
He seems like the BBC (MI7) ringleader here: a handler of this rag-tag UK bunch of D-list ‘authors’.
They peddle the hard right, “traditional values” wedge issues, which are just distractions since the cryptocracy at the highest levels only aim to depopulate and steal everything. To install UBC in CBDCs. Only so they can force vaccinate. You can’t get your digital programmable tokens without your cancer-clot-depop shots.
JD cartel signals with his hands all the time, straining to make it less obvious, which hilariously has the opposite effect!
He pushes the white pill psyop, which is a stand down psychological warfare tactic.
They use xenophobia, trauma based mind control, and focus on emotive traps like the Satanism psyop and the pedo psyop. Moral outrage and distract delay tactics is the goal.
The Saturn/Roman cult adhere to strict rituals and dates so the gematria and numerology is ‘everything’. As is, occult membership in the Order, the Family.
This was a really interesting and thorough response too!
I would only add that:
(1) CBDCs are being pushed by RDH, Iain Davis, Delingpole and UK Column and similar; and
(2) the latter (at least) also pushes the BRICS thing.
My guess, therefore, is that CBDCs and BRICS will be alt media - or all media -distraction topics, but much of the other points that you make still stand using the mode of commercial bank money.
Specifically,
I would make a sharp distinction between commercial bank money deposits and bank reserves. We mainly use the former and used to use cash (which are also not bank reserves). Bank reserves are used by banks at their central bank. CBDCs tend to be projects of central banks who muck about with bank reserves, not commercial bank money.
However, the monitoring, tracking, nudging and enforcing of people to use their commercial bank money by way of debit and credit cards instead of cash is accelarating - and that alone will link up with mandatory vaccinations, social credit monitoring, carbon consumption monitoring, tracking that you are a good global citizen and other things. All of this feeds the end goal of poisoning much of the existing population, creating a dumbed-down future slave class and eugenics. It is commercial banks and shops doing this with commercial bank money, not, at least at the moment, using bank reserves or CBDCs.
Also, Universal Basic Income (UBI or UB) is likely being discussed because technology is putting more people out of work, so they will have to turn to it for support to live. Taking UBI will, in time, I suspect, be attached to the recipient being a good global citizen. But this will all likely be done with commercial bank money, not bank reserves. I suspect that it is no coincidence that part of the unemployment welfare benifit in the UK got renamed as “Univeral Credit” some years ago.
Similarly, many counties including UK, US and Canda are signed up to international tax treaties and commercial bank account holders in those countries can be forced to give over money under this treaty. Interestingly, Turks and Cacos and other offshore islands are sined up to that treaty. One has to look hard for countries which are not! THe point is that if you do make a decent profit in a Western country, it will get harder to move it out of the reach of the taxman.
USD is the reserve currency for bank reserves and commercial bank money. Reserve currency status does change over time (e.g. shift from pound sterling to USD) but at the moment USD is needed even for BRICS countries. There is so much tied up with USD in all counties, I can’t see a change to the reserve currency happening yet. However, conflict with BRICS countries - or SEEMING conflict with them - can be used by media to advance many agendas.
Iain knows my views are in direct contrast to his, he rarely responds. I’ve read his lies and misdirection (with limited truth) for years on Off Guardian and I dispute his positions on many subjects including geopolitics. He can’t possibly go head to head with me. He simply doesn’t have the background, education or intellect.
Iain’s aligned with alt media outfits that all peddle obvious hoaxes and psyops. They’re 100% Intel controlled: Unlimited Hangout. Off Guardian. UK Column.
“Eve” is likely a construct, not a real person. Ergo, the “trial” is another masonic, humiliation, media ritual.
Iain promotes the RD Hall faux trial as real, when it’s merely propaganda in the Crown Temple’s censorship scare campaign.
Revisionist is laughable, like Woods, the TRANS 6 (3.3) year “coma” disinformation agent.
You’re free to promote disinfo agents. I don’t. I’ll call out anyone who lies, evades or omits crucial evidence.
I have a question for Mike though… Maybe you can answer. Does he mention that the PCR nasal assault probes were unnecessary, potentially harmful and obvious covert intranasal vaccinations? The cribriform plate is porous.
A few other things that I remember in no particular order:
(1) RDH's assertion that prior to 2013(?) victims were (or might be) real, but were not thereafter, seems to be a re-assertion of a hypothesis made years earlier by Ole Dammegard. Ole Dammegard (check spelling) was saying a similar thing in the late 2010s (?) BECAUSE - actually I do not remember his explanation exactly: It MIGHT have been that there is this CIA whistle-blower the late Cody Snodgrass and he asserted that claim, so it must be true.
(2) Ole D. also pushes the crisis actor phenomenon heavily, as does RDH, and others; contrast this with Dallasgoldbug's rejection of them in favour of "reality-based actors". The latter are one person going by different names and sometimes changed appearances in all of these events, sometimes they may be trading financial products in the aftermath of a crisis under and alias.
(3) Dallasgoldbug had a quarrel with Mathis back in the day about Mathis stealing some of his work, although the former's output is now awkwardly arranged and I cannot locate the link. When I read it, I thought that Dallas came out of it better.
(4) I did email RDH suggesting that the number "22" may have been a disguised use of the number "4" as is, for example, "13", "31", "112", "211", "49", "77" and similar; he did reply; but on Delingpole he said something like number coding of that sort was "the kind of thing that Ole D. would do".
(5) Blue slipper link is interesting. There is also something about "red shoes". There is a Kate Bush single (and album?) "The Red Shoes". The cOX event had red shoes on the floor. Westminster Bridge in 2017 had something with red or blue trainers too I think. And Twin Peaks s01Ep01 had a girl dancing across a hotel chequered floor with red shoes I think.
(6) Bartoll SE site is usually well worth a read. It may not be perfect, like much internet material, including my own, but worth reading.
(7) On another thread you or BSM mentioned that MAF or MASF or MSF was mixing Mathis into her work without acknowledgement. Now, she does know of Mathis because in her (first?) Delingpole interview she discusses their daily reads (Daily Mail, Mankow, etc.); JD mentions Mathis; she says "I'll have to check him out" or similar. That was circa 18 months ago! So more than 18 months ago MAF probably did not know about Mathis and her content was different, but since then she does. Since then all her substacking and "spooks faking their deaths" pieces have been created and pushed.
(8) Lien Sanders in his podcast with that MK Ultra looking guy who used to hang out with (ex-UKIP) Anne Marie Waters (Brent something or another - Lee I think) used the "hidden camera" and "stalker" narrative to turn against RDH and do the interview with BBC's Spring: But we now know the "hidden camera" and "stalker" are deceptions from every side and dimension of the story. Lien Sanders has not corrected himself on this point as far as I am aware.
8) Neil (Lien) Sanders and his pal Brent (Bent-Lee, Bentley) Lee are a joke. They’re implying Hall’s delusional and gone off the rails. I saw a few minutes of their podcast on the trial outcome and that was more than enough.
Interesting that a UKIP shill is tangentially connected to this psyop. It’s such an incestuous gang of frauds. In politics. Intel. Media.
I haven’t seen the Spring - Sanders interview but it indicates that Hall, Sanders, Spring, Hibbert (photographed with Spring) etc., are all colluding in scripted theater.
Hall, Hibbert (haha and hihi) probably meet each other in the lodge at the weekends and have a drink and a laugh :) The others are perhaps only usefull idiots just like Iani etc
Brent Lee (from a military family say other researchers) hung out with Anne Marie Waters when she was doing the anti-islam thing. Brent Lee also questioned 7/7. Anne Marie Waters has been a member of UK Labour party, UKIP (twice once pre-2017, once post2022), For Britain party (which she founded) despite being born in the Republic of Ireland and being an Issh citizen at some point.
1) Interesting. I don’t watch (sic) Old Dam-Guard. The tv character types like OD and RDH appear to be sanctioned gatekeepers by ‘state’ apparatus.
2) Hall’s 2013 date (when he says no-kill hoaxes begins) is masonic numerology in itself 2013 : 2 × 1 x 3 = 6 or 3.3 (33)
or 2 + 1 + 3 = 6 or (33)
Hall’s intimating he’s not researched masonic numerology in depth, then immediately follows with a Masonic numerology cartel signal: Mocking the audience.
This is common with media masons: Occasional, but limited mention of numerology, Gematria or Freemasonry.
Mathis does this when he may only mention the number 18.
18 = 1 + 8 = (9) = 6 + 3 or 3 x 3
So triple 3’s. 18 also is (6 × 3).
So 3.3 in triple.
And 18 is also 2 x 9 or (9.9) 9 being a highly significant and important number.
Thank you all responses today are very interesting and informative!
Not sure whether this should be filed here or under the red shoes post: Hall did several documentaries on Jo Cox, Tommy MAir and similar: In those films, symbolism of red shoes (Cox’s supposedly) and a cat (Mair supposedly liked them) featured very prominently on multiple occassions. But RDH never points out WHY he featured those red shoes so muich: he just put them in his films! So there we have it occassional reference to symbolism, deliberate reference, but limited too!
Some of the ‘photos’ of Mathis feature him playing GOLF, which he also talks about, “four” or “fore” has significant meaning in golf.
Also, 13: 1+3=4. Now, if you take figures of 1 and 3, put one set reading left to right on a piece of paper as normal:“13”, and another on a flippable transparency and put it over the one on paper you get: “18”. The figure “1”s merge to make “1” again and the “3”s three end points meet and join to make “8”. Thus you have his famous “aces and eights” - “18” - too!
Red shoes reference. Also in Wizard of Oz with the Ruby shoes. Red being a Cardinal color of the Vatican. Red Shield is the Rothschild name meaning. They’re a shield for the Vatican.
Red’s a Sacrificial color. Color of blood. Red and Blue refer to the Masonic degrees.
Red plus blue = Purple = Color of royalty.
The controllers use sacrificial stunt operatives wearing red (a red backpack, a red top etc) in protests being dragged off or assaulted by Freemasonic police. Here a stuntwoman falls, supposedly trampled by horses at the ConPloy psyop. Dressed in red. 2-18-2022.
So Alice’s red shoes? In Alice in Wonderland? What’s the meaning there? And is Alice a victim of sexual abuse after the passing out bit? From the drugging?
Its BLOOD. Life force & awakening into different thresholds.
ie Puberty
No person goes down rabbit holes, it is a phrase for the gullible to regurgitate.
No sane person choses between one pill or the other.
Chasing rabbits & barking up trees is what the oppressors wish us to do.
The Adomite paintings will give you the answers to the above questions, they don’t hide what they do , & that artwork tells you everything you need to know quite overtly, tho needs some background to decipher.
Thanks. Not coincidentally, the UKIP colour is (or was) purple (with some yellow and/or white) which many of these actors and their mates discussed here and elsewhere have connections with!
7) Yes. Nushi was the one who noticed MASF was copying Mathis after claiming ignorance of his work in that Dellingpole interview. I don’t read Miri.
Mathis (and Miriam Sloboda Finch) push the Jew psyop (how can atheists be Jews? Judaism is a religion not a race. Jews aren’t a race, there are/were no 12 tribes, it’s zodiac astrological allegory) which draws attention away from the control mechanisms which all emanate from the Vatican, Catholicism and the Saturn-Rome Cult which encompasses (and created) all Abrahamic religions as a mass mind control tool using ‘divide et Impera’.
MASF also promotes Henry Makow, another gatekeeper. And Owen Benjamin, another disinformation agent. With his bear club: An allusion to gay stereotypes (Bear) and the secret sodomy within Freemasonry.
This gatekeeping is pernicious because they’re using religion and race “theory” as a divisive deflection from the worldwide mechanism of structural control through innumerable corporate-legal criminal frauds.
3) I did read the Dallas Goldbug - Mathis dust up some time ago. Perhaps Mathis was tasked with taking over that sphere. Or used GB’s stuff as a jumping off point. Goldbug’s an obvious agent. Was the squabble real? Hard to tell.
But Goldbug was correct to a point. The reality based actors have multiple names, alias’s in some cases.
I’ve seen several “witnesses” to ‘terror’ used in multiple psyops: Miki Willis is an obvious example: 9/11 “witness” his “Plandemic” role and a “viral” video of his son playing with a doll: Gender identity confusion.
Assange was involved in a psyop as a child: called “the Family”. A faux cult that didn’t even exist. It was a media hoax. So, he was a child actor, not an MK ultra victim. Hall, demonstrates consistent gatekeeping on all his subjects.
WikiLIES was a Cass Sunstein “cognitive infiltration” operation outed in 2011 by Webster Tarpley PhD:
Veterans Today? I do not read it. It’s one of only two sites (left unadulterated) that published the Tarpley article. It was originally on Webster Tarpley’s own site. But was removed.
“noticed about Sanders that he had a droll manner of delivery that has him going on and on without ever reaching a conclusion. In the PID stuff I decided that his role was to keep the juggler’s balls in the air, to never let the mystery be settled even as I made it obvious to him that it was settled.
I judged him to be a disinformation agent. His heavy exposure on the Hall show made me suspicious of Hall, who was also a promoter of the work of Dr. Judy Wood. I had not yet figured out Wood at that time, but that circle is now complete.
Since that time Mr. Hall has taken on the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6owsiL9CpK8 a young girl who disappeared in Portugal in 2007, or so we are told. It has all the markings of a JonBenét-like psyop. It is the reason I ultimately came to conclude that Richard C. Hall is a disinformation agent.”
the shoe thing is also some masonic crap but also connects to either wizard of oz(os) or alice in wonderrland (or both) see my “Note” about LH Oswald on how important those are (alice and OZ)
and what is the deal with the 4 i do not see this as an “suspect” number at all and to ur last point, i have an interesting link for this sanders guy… where mark T (of POM) has a story to tell about sanders & RDH. post it later when time. hint was friend/guest on RDHs show but ran some damage control for the mason hoax :)) yes this web is spun wide even back to the alledged woodstock / drug murderers like man-SON who never was in jail :P GRÜEZI vom SCHAF
An impressive post. I have to admit my failure in researching this more thoroughly. This has been an eye opener. I've had my suspicions of the Judy Wood DEW thingy and although guilt through association is in no way hard evidence, there is a connection between Wood, through Andrew Johnson, to Hall, which at the very least is suspicious. The exposure of the bomb hoax was already clearly presented by other researchers prior to Hall, and more thoroughly, it makes me wonder, why did he even bother. Very fishy.
Why did Hall bother? Almost nothing he did makes any sense. There’s so many bizarre contradictions and anomalies in the judgment pdf. I’d love to see the whole trial transcript.
Re Judy Wood and DEWS. I knew she was sketchy when there was an alleged shooting of her “assistant.” To make her work look important.
And this DEW psyop at the time was being heavily pushed in the US by Jesse Ventura on TV. Ex Navy Seal. Ex World Wide Wrestler. And ex-Governor.
This is highly speculative, and expressed as a very speculative exloratory list of hypotheses, but anyway:
(1) MH's solicitors is Hudgell or Hudgell's or Hudgells.
(2) Hudgells assisted Alan Bates in the UK Post Office scandal, which received massive UK media attention and had its own primetime UK TV dramatisation. The scandal put the UK Post Office hugely in the wrong and the ordinary citizen contractor like Mr Bates in the right, if you believe the narritive. It co-incided with a decline in service of the UK post office, employee strikes, and later a sale to a person overseas.
(3) At the time of the drama Richard Branson gave Alan Bates a holiday on his private island. Why? I thought that Branson himself might have wanted a hostile takeover of the Post Office - and a one-to-one chat with Bates may have furnished him with information - but that takeover did not materialise.
(4) Controversially, according to Dallasgoldbug, Richard Branson and David Icke are the same actor. And their spouses look similar too.
(5) If you accept all of that, then the group controlling the actor Richard Branson/David Icke, gave Alan Bates a holiday, and Alan Bates who uses Hudgells solicitors. Consequently that group are likely at least neutral or look favourably on the causes taken up by Hudgells solicitors; perhaps there is a very much close connection.
(6) Hudgells solicitors defend - or at least accept - the official Manchester narritive of course.
(7) Richie Alan is a spin-off of David Icke - or if you accept some of the above - a spin-off of the group controlling the actor playing Branson/Icke. Richie Allen is also promoting some of the key areas of the Manchester narritive and criticises RDH's take too. This once again indicates that the group controlling Branson/Icke want to hold up the official Manchester narritive via Richie Allen's actions, if you accept the controversial claims above.
(8) There was a time - I think - when RDH both promoted and sold the books of David Icke and Lien Sanders - at least I think but I am not sure. And there may have been a time when the David Icke website may have also - at one point in time 10, 15, 20 years ago - sold RDH's material and Lien Sanders'. Although, I'd need some way of checking that and I doubt waybackmachine or similar are that good. So, is there a genuine fall out between "Icke" and RDH, or are they in league with this stage play all along? Also, I think that RDH and Andrew Johnson may have done a show - it might have beeen a 3-parter - on David Icke - but again I'd need to check to be sure.
(9) Paul JOSEPH Watson I believe is a spin-off of Icke and Alex Jones. Milo Yianoppolus (who worked with Delingpole at Brietbart) might be too. These two, in 2018, joined UKIP controversially when RDH-barrister Paul Oakley was in the hierarchy. i.e. Oakley at least tolerated their membership and behaviour even though doing that was accelerating the decline of a populist movement.
(10) So a speculative guess is that this is a small number of stage-players running in small-ish interlocking networks.
(11) Both "Branson" and "Icke" have appeared on the UK TV chat show "Wogan" at least once, with the latter appearing in turquoise (later to be the colours of Farage outfits The Brexit Party and Reform UK).
Yes, there’s a noticeable pattern in these legal psyops, lawyers and firms who are used more than once in staged trials and politically motivated media psyops.
Here’s an example: Another Keele University Crown Temple agent, Michael Mansfield:
Jill Dando murder hoax. But take a look at his other high profile media trials and that’s an indication that they’re also likely to be faux and staged.
funny but fake looking pic… but nice article, finally a better “sum up” of these event(s). i mean mostly the RDH/BBC etc shillery as the man event was exposed long ago and Rich was not among the early exposers…
I’m not disagreeing with your take on RDH, but I’m curious why MIri Finch has come in for criticism. Wasn’t she echoing your view in calling out RDH as an agent?
Sloboda Finch reinforces several frauds to do with the Arena hoax and the aftermath.
Firstly, she can’t have even bothered to read the summary judgment.
1) She implies the trial is real and the outcome. It’s not, it’s staged nonsense, so the outcome is literally a psyop and scare campaign.
2) The judgment against Hall can be easily vacated since he never saw or filmed Eve. His testimony is purely for self incrimination.
3) Any alleged claim of “stalker man” and the construct “Eve’s” knowledge of a stalker is actually as a result of being told by Hibbert and Gillbard. Why would they do that to someone who is supposedly depressed, disabled, suffers PTSD and has the “reading” age of a 9 year old?
4) The judgment transcript doesn’t explain how Hall allegedly got Gillbard’s address when Hibbert claimed Hall never contacted him. Since “Eve” is an alleged witness and victim in a hoax or an alleged ‘real’ event then Gillbard’s number and address wouldn’t be publicly available. In either case.
3) ‘Eve’s Law’ can’t be enforced and it’s highly unlikely Hall would agree to participate in setting himself up for future trial without assurances by the Crown Temple and his handler that they’d pay all legal costs and all damages. He’s not an idiot. Nobody who’s allegedly had all his experience is going to participate in their own demise, reputation and fiscal situation without a large monetary exchange.
4) Sloboda Finch claims Hall stalked a young girl, there’s no evidence he did that a) because there’s no actual evidence he was ever at Sarah Gillbard’s address, only his worthless testimony, and b) “Eve’s” a construct and not a witness or participant.
5) It’s only Hall’s lies about Eve and his own behavior on film where he incriminates himself needlessly, then lies about filming someone in a wheelchair with a carer and Gillbard, that he’s established the existence of a construct as a real person, and as disabled. At minimum if Eve exists, which I doubt, she was never at the Arena.
6) Sloboda Finch basically endorses the legal system as valid, with lawful authority and doesn’t bother connecting any dots with this or other hoaxes, just analyses Hall’s participation in the most superficial and false way, so the audience is still unaware of the purpose and depth of controlled opposition and the fraud of the legal system and government authority.
7) Sloboda Finch said Hall broke the story. No he did not. Many others broke it. It was common knowledge before he ever said a word or produced a book and video.
He was used by the Crown Temple to suppress the Manchester hoax dissemination, to taint all skeptics of state fabricated ‘terror’ as sick and delusional.
The Manchester Arena Hoax was broken wide open literally the day after by numerous YouTubers, and in the proceeding days and weeks.
It was done and dusted by the time Hall even mentioned it, so why is Sloboda Finch lying about Hall and his role?
Thanks for clarifying. You certainly have gone into the details of this case. I’ve got to admit I only came across the Manchester hoax through RDHs website, but there was a lot about him and Nick Kollerstrom I didn’t take to.
You’re welcome. I didn’t even look into this case until I noticed there were so many omissions by the group of four commentators - Davis, Hughes, O’Laughlan and Finch.
I forgot to mention something that’s key: The commentariat (or Hall) won’t bring up the “burden of proof” principle. In law, science and philosophy this principle applies.
They can’t all not know. So, they’re gatekeeping within the Overton window.
1) She claims there were victims. The vicSIMS report shows otherwise.
2) The towers had been cordoned off for months by the Port Authority using barricades. Under the “renovations” pretext. There were no tenants in the buildings by the time they were stripped and set with explosives. They were all pulled.
3) There’s no nukes. No mini nukes, no neutron bombs, no secret directed energy weapon that can disintegrate or melt steel. There’s no scientific evidence on Wood’s side.
4) There was no dustification of the steel. All the steel beams were there and visible. There’s tons of rubble that took weeks to remove on giant barges. The buildings didn’t GO anywhere. They were destroyed.
5) Judy Wood and her “assistant” were in a psyop where he was allegedly randomly murdered by a marauding robber. An absurd, preposterous hoax.
6) She’s a laughable ‘character’. And trans. So that’s just more mockery the controllers are attempting to inflict.
7) The buildings were built visibly hollow. Many floors weren’t in existence, the elevator banks only utilized some sections and floors. Not the entire building.
8) The footage Wood used was falsified and fabricated, so her entire theory rests on faux footage and faux pics.
9) Judy Wood’s backstory isn’t credible. She apparently woke up from a coma of 6 years (3.3) and knew she had to become a professor.
The MO of the cryptocracy is to always provide at least two false opposition dichotomies (Hegelian Dialectic) to get people arguing about irrelevant nonsense. Thermite vs DEWS.
Here Researcher has shown you BOTH views of MSM & alternative poseurs is insubstantial fictions!
Instead of addressing any discrepancies , you have just gone & made a funny angry little dance, like eager freshly gelded pony in need of a carrot to chase for old times sake.
What is it about Judy Wood that we should take serious? I watch her & she is inarticulate, mumbling creature from deep sea trawling, is she from same hatchling colony as Psi-coco Op Petra ?
I was wondering if you can supply me with a link of any of her professional papers pre the 911 work. It is listed that there is over 60 on her bio, but I could not find any registered or available on the net.
Also, it would be reassuring to know what DEW can turn metal into dust?
DEWs do certainly exist as a fact & we can even build our own if so inclined, but none of the ones I am aware of can disintegrate metals, not even the ‘not always convincing’ work of John Hutchinson.
I am trying not to use the term dustify because it sounds child like to use, when disintegrate is a more proper expression?
Thank you for helping me see the truth of what you say on this Tim West.
But as you should be aware Tim I do not have any authority fallicies as I have never trusted them.
It sounds like you are again transferring your own repulsion at historic self ignorance , because of new fashionable insight you discover?
Please address my questions to you, before we get intimate in discussion here.
What you are doing is even greater fallacy game, as all of us who know of fallacies are well aware of by now. Usually I find people new to idea of fallacy have to over use it when decent discussion does not need such trivial analysis of fashions, or old tactics to get to meat of the matter.
The important issue is where is all the academic papers claimed to exist that can not be found? Please supply links, or it will appear Ms WoodPecker is an actress pretending to be more than she is.
Thanks for the nice words! I’m looking forward to the next major piece …
The dishwasher analogy is accurate. I have a newly written piece and it just needs to be tweaked, then installed. Just like my dishwasher still sitting in the living room. A stainless steel cube. A sculpture. The potential is there … 😂
‘‘The allegorical maintenance of a dish washer,’’ sound like very cheap, pre-certificate 1980s Horror film, or a Liverpool psychedelic indie beat group doing concept LP .
🙄🤔🤨
I must say you are very cheeky to discuss such things, I will never tell you any secrets again about household dilemmas. Researcher is very busy person who has no time to be indulgent with riff raff like yourself asking stupidness that is not your concern, now be off with you & go finish that MadJester Event symbolism essay you have been sitting on for many moons now.
I can’t reply to your Jew-dee Woods comments. I can’t even like them! Some psychopath got his panties in a twist after I asked him a question and then he blocked me. So I can’t even see or respond to that entire thread. Talk about a shit and run. 🙄
“I’m just looking at Jamie Andrews (I just realized it is actually Mike Yeadon , they are all blurring into one“
😂 They’re merging…
I actually asked “Tim” (the scientist he called himself !!! 😂🤣) about why Mike hasn’t mentioned that the PCR assault probes were obviously intranasal vaccination.
OMG that happens to me too! My keyboard freezes, on my phone. It’s only ever happened here. SubSchlock is definitely sub-par and compromised at the backend and the front. 😂 Much like that gang of BBC (MI7) gangstalkers.
Fantastic work! I hope that I.D., M.A.F., G.O.D. and others go through this line by line, stating where they agree or disagree and WHY! But I will not hold my breath waiting…
Hi Ross, thanks so much! They’ll read it no doubt and avoid responding the same way they assiduously avoid truth in their posts.
I did link to Ailing-O-Loch-Clan’s profile … in the first paragraph! Hehe.
Miriam Sloboda-Finch has no respect for her readers that’s why she turned off open comments. She avoids all reality.
Hughes should throw himself on Davis’ imaginary Gladius sword vector on the front of Davis’ ‘book’, for turning one post into 6 parts digital ambien and 2 parts word salad midazolam.
Excellent work again - links to external sites are very thorough as well!
Please could you check the link to either “Resiliant cities” or “Strong cities” - the “geosites” one - as I think that it may have become truncated in the publishing process?
I saw the Aisling link - fantastic!
MAF (or MASF or MSF) did not reply to me when I emailed about gematria - switching off comments therefore is no surprise. Switching-off comments could be used as a tactic to block trolls. Although screaming “trolls are attacking me” can also be an evasion tactic.
The wellaware site is a good one: I wonder what happened to Dallasgoldbug, as his output has fallen off?
Some of those mentioned are part of the “puff of smoke” entrance phenomenon: you’ve never heard of them, then all of a sudden they are on the Delingpod with a book, buymeacoffee page and similar.
Hi Ross, thanks so much for alerting me about the link. I’ll fix it asap.
I can’t add or modify links directly in substack, I had to figure out a way to create an external document first, with embedded links, then copy paste those here. And in the process of my endless edits, I may have messed up that link. So thank you for telling me. Much appreciated.
Indeed. MASB is quite evasive on many subjects and deliberately so.
The cartel-cult members do not want certain topics discussed so they refuse to touch them, and only mention them in the most banal and superficial way.
It’s fascinating (congrats!) that you were the cause of Miri turning off her comments. Did you notice she called those who criticize her or ask questions “sub-stalkers”?
Frankly, I think she just can’t handle any heat whatsoever because she has a lot to hide. She’s far from the persona she projects. I mean, Miri promotes Henry Makow.
Anyone following Makow is falling into the ‘Jew psyop’ trap which is, of course, what the Jesuits and Catholic orders promote endlessly through their agents as a ‘divide et Impera’ tool.
I’m not sure that I can claim credit for that. I tried posting a comment on her website article - I’m not sure that she had a substack back then - that was not allowed, so I emailed and no response!
The money and banking system is one topic that they all tend to avoid - except when it is in the Jesuit/Catholic psy-op way!
Edit: PS Come to think of it Delingpole made his comments and articles ‘paid only’ shortly after I was discussing the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Hope Not Hate and money and how they were subtley working with right-wing think tanks that one would think they outh to be opposed to. And, it was also shortly after I did a lot of George Orwell, 1984 and gematria in one of the comments on his article, which received no response.
Interesting! Delingpole is a fascinating Oxbridge type, hunt club, silly ‘character’.
He seems like the BBC (MI7) ringleader here: a handler of this rag-tag UK bunch of D-list ‘authors’.
They peddle the hard right, “traditional values” wedge issues, which are just distractions since the cryptocracy at the highest levels only aim to depopulate and steal everything. To install UBC in CBDCs. Only so they can force vaccinate. You can’t get your digital programmable tokens without your cancer-clot-depop shots.
JD cartel signals with his hands all the time, straining to make it less obvious, which hilariously has the opposite effect!
He pushes the white pill psyop, which is a stand down psychological warfare tactic.
They use xenophobia, trauma based mind control, and focus on emotive traps like the Satanism psyop and the pedo psyop. Moral outrage and distract delay tactics is the goal.
The Saturn/Roman cult adhere to strict rituals and dates so the gematria and numerology is ‘everything’. As is, occult membership in the Order, the Family.
The cryoptocracy are currently running a monotheistic (Abrahamic) end times prophecy script. They’ll likely expand the chaos, to transition to the controlled demolition of the current financial system. Probably using some NATO vs BRICS hacking + EMP hoax. https://www.mitre.org/news-insights/impact-story/electromagnetic-pulse-dangerous-overlooked-threat
This was a really interesting and thorough response too!
I would only add that:
(1) CBDCs are being pushed by RDH, Iain Davis, Delingpole and UK Column and similar; and
(2) the latter (at least) also pushes the BRICS thing.
My guess, therefore, is that CBDCs and BRICS will be alt media - or all media -distraction topics, but much of the other points that you make still stand using the mode of commercial bank money.
Specifically,
I would make a sharp distinction between commercial bank money deposits and bank reserves. We mainly use the former and used to use cash (which are also not bank reserves). Bank reserves are used by banks at their central bank. CBDCs tend to be projects of central banks who muck about with bank reserves, not commercial bank money.
However, the monitoring, tracking, nudging and enforcing of people to use their commercial bank money by way of debit and credit cards instead of cash is accelarating - and that alone will link up with mandatory vaccinations, social credit monitoring, carbon consumption monitoring, tracking that you are a good global citizen and other things. All of this feeds the end goal of poisoning much of the existing population, creating a dumbed-down future slave class and eugenics. It is commercial banks and shops doing this with commercial bank money, not, at least at the moment, using bank reserves or CBDCs.
Also, Universal Basic Income (UBI or UB) is likely being discussed because technology is putting more people out of work, so they will have to turn to it for support to live. Taking UBI will, in time, I suspect, be attached to the recipient being a good global citizen. But this will all likely be done with commercial bank money, not bank reserves. I suspect that it is no coincidence that part of the unemployment welfare benifit in the UK got renamed as “Univeral Credit” some years ago.
Similarly, many counties including UK, US and Canda are signed up to international tax treaties and commercial bank account holders in those countries can be forced to give over money under this treaty. Interestingly, Turks and Cacos and other offshore islands are sined up to that treaty. One has to look hard for countries which are not! THe point is that if you do make a decent profit in a Western country, it will get harder to move it out of the reach of the taxman.
USD is the reserve currency for bank reserves and commercial bank money. Reserve currency status does change over time (e.g. shift from pound sterling to USD) but at the moment USD is needed even for BRICS countries. There is so much tied up with USD in all counties, I can’t see a change to the reserve currency happening yet. However, conflict with BRICS countries - or SEEMING conflict with them - can be used by media to advance many agendas.
Here’s the link where Sloboda-Finch uses the word “substalkers” : https://miri.substack.com/p/the-conspirasocialists/comment/79997610
Iain’s far from meticulous.
Iain knows my views are in direct contrast to his, he rarely responds. I’ve read his lies and misdirection (with limited truth) for years on Off Guardian and I dispute his positions on many subjects including geopolitics. He can’t possibly go head to head with me. He simply doesn’t have the background, education or intellect.
Iain’s aligned with alt media outfits that all peddle obvious hoaxes and psyops. They’re 100% Intel controlled: Unlimited Hangout. Off Guardian. UK Column.
“Eve” is likely a construct, not a real person. Ergo, the “trial” is another masonic, humiliation, media ritual.
Iain promotes the RD Hall faux trial as real, when it’s merely propaganda in the Crown Temple’s censorship scare campaign.
Revisionist is laughable, like Woods, the TRANS 6 (3.3) year “coma” disinformation agent.
You’re free to promote disinfo agents. I don’t. I’ll call out anyone who lies, evades or omits crucial evidence.
I have a question for Mike though… Maybe you can answer. Does he mention that the PCR nasal assault probes were unnecessary, potentially harmful and obvious covert intranasal vaccinations? The cribriform plate is porous.
https://silview.media/2020/11/26/they-can-vaccinate-us-through-nasal-test-swabs/
A few other things that I remember in no particular order:
(1) RDH's assertion that prior to 2013(?) victims were (or might be) real, but were not thereafter, seems to be a re-assertion of a hypothesis made years earlier by Ole Dammegard. Ole Dammegard (check spelling) was saying a similar thing in the late 2010s (?) BECAUSE - actually I do not remember his explanation exactly: It MIGHT have been that there is this CIA whistle-blower the late Cody Snodgrass and he asserted that claim, so it must be true.
(2) Ole D. also pushes the crisis actor phenomenon heavily, as does RDH, and others; contrast this with Dallasgoldbug's rejection of them in favour of "reality-based actors". The latter are one person going by different names and sometimes changed appearances in all of these events, sometimes they may be trading financial products in the aftermath of a crisis under and alias.
(3) Dallasgoldbug had a quarrel with Mathis back in the day about Mathis stealing some of his work, although the former's output is now awkwardly arranged and I cannot locate the link. When I read it, I thought that Dallas came out of it better.
(4) I did email RDH suggesting that the number "22" may have been a disguised use of the number "4" as is, for example, "13", "31", "112", "211", "49", "77" and similar; he did reply; but on Delingpole he said something like number coding of that sort was "the kind of thing that Ole D. would do".
(5) Blue slipper link is interesting. There is also something about "red shoes". There is a Kate Bush single (and album?) "The Red Shoes". The cOX event had red shoes on the floor. Westminster Bridge in 2017 had something with red or blue trainers too I think. And Twin Peaks s01Ep01 had a girl dancing across a hotel chequered floor with red shoes I think.
(6) Bartoll SE site is usually well worth a read. It may not be perfect, like much internet material, including my own, but worth reading.
(7) On another thread you or BSM mentioned that MAF or MASF or MSF was mixing Mathis into her work without acknowledgement. Now, she does know of Mathis because in her (first?) Delingpole interview she discusses their daily reads (Daily Mail, Mankow, etc.); JD mentions Mathis; she says "I'll have to check him out" or similar. That was circa 18 months ago! So more than 18 months ago MAF probably did not know about Mathis and her content was different, but since then she does. Since then all her substacking and "spooks faking their deaths" pieces have been created and pushed.
(8) Lien Sanders in his podcast with that MK Ultra looking guy who used to hang out with (ex-UKIP) Anne Marie Waters (Brent something or another - Lee I think) used the "hidden camera" and "stalker" narrative to turn against RDH and do the interview with BBC's Spring: But we now know the "hidden camera" and "stalker" are deceptions from every side and dimension of the story. Lien Sanders has not corrected himself on this point as far as I am aware.
8) Neil (Lien) Sanders and his pal Brent (Bent-Lee, Bentley) Lee are a joke. They’re implying Hall’s delusional and gone off the rails. I saw a few minutes of their podcast on the trial outcome and that was more than enough.
Interesting that a UKIP shill is tangentially connected to this psyop. It’s such an incestuous gang of frauds. In politics. Intel. Media.
I haven’t seen the Spring - Sanders interview but it indicates that Hall, Sanders, Spring, Hibbert (photographed with Spring) etc., are all colluding in scripted theater.
Hall, Hibbert (haha and hihi) probably meet each other in the lodge at the weekends and have a drink and a laugh :) The others are perhaps only usefull idiots just like Iani etc
Indirect UKIP connection. Specifically:
Brent Lee (from a military family say other researchers) hung out with Anne Marie Waters when she was doing the anti-islam thing. Brent Lee also questioned 7/7. Anne Marie Waters has been a member of UK Labour party, UKIP (twice once pre-2017, once post2022), For Britain party (which she founded) despite being born in the Republic of Ireland and being an Issh citizen at some point.
1) Interesting. I don’t watch (sic) Old Dam-Guard. The tv character types like OD and RDH appear to be sanctioned gatekeepers by ‘state’ apparatus.
2) Hall’s 2013 date (when he says no-kill hoaxes begins) is masonic numerology in itself 2013 : 2 × 1 x 3 = 6 or 3.3 (33)
or 2 + 1 + 3 = 6 or (33)
Hall’s intimating he’s not researched masonic numerology in depth, then immediately follows with a Masonic numerology cartel signal: Mocking the audience.
This is common with media masons: Occasional, but limited mention of numerology, Gematria or Freemasonry.
Mathis does this when he may only mention the number 18.
18 = 1 + 8 = (9) = 6 + 3 or 3 x 3
So triple 3’s. 18 also is (6 × 3).
So 3.3 in triple.
And 18 is also 2 x 9 or (9.9) 9 being a highly significant and important number.
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/9_(number)
3 = Triangle or Trinity.
And 4 is significant. 4 represents the Masonic square, the square in the masonic apron.
While 3 is the triangle inside the apron.
In Masonry, the number 4 is associated with the four cardinal virtues.
And Mathis’ Pi = 4 is a reference to the Masonic square.
4 also references the Masonic ciphers. Which are within square and triangle symbols.
And the Masonic cube (Ashlar) = Saturn cube. Masons also use a black cube to vote “no” in their secret ballots.
Thank you all responses today are very interesting and informative!
Not sure whether this should be filed here or under the red shoes post: Hall did several documentaries on Jo Cox, Tommy MAir and similar: In those films, symbolism of red shoes (Cox’s supposedly) and a cat (Mair supposedly liked them) featured very prominently on multiple occassions. But RDH never points out WHY he featured those red shoes so muich: he just put them in his films! So there we have it occassional reference to symbolism, deliberate reference, but limited too!
Some of the ‘photos’ of Mathis feature him playing GOLF, which he also talks about, “four” or “fore” has significant meaning in golf.
Also, 13: 1+3=4. Now, if you take figures of 1 and 3, put one set reading left to right on a piece of paper as normal:“13”, and another on a flippable transparency and put it over the one on paper you get: “18”. The figure “1”s merge to make “1” again and the “3”s three end points meet and join to make “8”. Thus you have his famous “aces and eights” - “18” - too!
Yes. Very interesting stuff. He’s using symbology and then not explaining that to his audience. Misleading.
I tried to post something else in reply to you, but substack is blocking the outbound link. I’ll have to send it to you via the message system.
Hi Ross, great points. I’ll break down your points into separate replies. Due to length.
(5) More on the shoes, and being barefoot in masonry:
https://www.thesquaremagazine.com/mag/article/202302masonic-miscellanies-bare-feet-and-freemasonry/
Red shoes reference. Also in Wizard of Oz with the Ruby shoes. Red being a Cardinal color of the Vatican. Red Shield is the Rothschild name meaning. They’re a shield for the Vatican.
Red’s a Sacrificial color. Color of blood. Red and Blue refer to the Masonic degrees.
Red plus blue = Purple = Color of royalty.
The controllers use sacrificial stunt operatives wearing red (a red backpack, a red top etc) in protests being dragged off or assaulted by Freemasonic police. Here a stuntwoman falls, supposedly trampled by horses at the ConPloy psyop. Dressed in red. 2-18-2022.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBkafptu__g
Actor has her red coffee cup in plain sight in hospital.
Result of medical records, no real injuries other than a strained shoulder.
https://globalnews.ca/news/8735174/ottawa-protest-woman-horse-incident-investigation/
ahem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Shoes_(1948_film)
🤔
😂 I completely forgot that movie. And I’ve seen it. It’s horrific! Maybe that’s why…
Also it is about SCARLETT WOMEN,
who were revered then prostituted when cults & fashions changed.
So Alice’s red shoes? In Alice in Wonderland? What’s the meaning there? And is Alice a victim of sexual abuse after the passing out bit? From the drugging?
Its BLOOD. Life force & awakening into different thresholds.
ie Puberty
No person goes down rabbit holes, it is a phrase for the gullible to regurgitate.
No sane person choses between one pill or the other.
Chasing rabbits & barking up trees is what the oppressors wish us to do.
The Adomite paintings will give you the answers to the above questions, they don’t hide what they do , & that artwork tells you everything you need to know quite overtly, tho needs some background to decipher.
Thank you RAM. Also noted:
“The plot is based on the 1845 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Shoes_(fairy_tale) by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Christian_Andersen, and features a ballet within it by the same title, also adapted from the Andersen work.”
Thanks. Not coincidentally, the UKIP colour is (or was) purple (with some yellow and/or white) which many of these actors and their mates discussed here and elsewhere have connections with!
7) Yes. Nushi was the one who noticed MASF was copying Mathis after claiming ignorance of his work in that Dellingpole interview. I don’t read Miri.
Mathis (and Miriam Sloboda Finch) push the Jew psyop (how can atheists be Jews? Judaism is a religion not a race. Jews aren’t a race, there are/were no 12 tribes, it’s zodiac astrological allegory) which draws attention away from the control mechanisms which all emanate from the Vatican, Catholicism and the Saturn-Rome Cult which encompasses (and created) all Abrahamic religions as a mass mind control tool using ‘divide et Impera’.
MASF also promotes Henry Makow, another gatekeeper. And Owen Benjamin, another disinformation agent. With his bear club: An allusion to gay stereotypes (Bear) and the secret sodomy within Freemasonry.
This gatekeeping is pernicious because they’re using religion and race “theory” as a divisive deflection from the worldwide mechanism of structural control through innumerable corporate-legal criminal frauds.
3) I did read the Dallas Goldbug - Mathis dust up some time ago. Perhaps Mathis was tasked with taking over that sphere. Or used GB’s stuff as a jumping off point. Goldbug’s an obvious agent. Was the squabble real? Hard to tell.
But Goldbug was correct to a point. The reality based actors have multiple names, alias’s in some cases.
I’ve seen several “witnesses” to ‘terror’ used in multiple psyops: Miki Willis is an obvious example: 9/11 “witness” his “Plandemic” role and a “viral” video of his son playing with a doll: Gender identity confusion.
Assange was involved in a psyop as a child: called “the Family”. A faux cult that didn’t even exist. It was a media hoax. So, he was a child actor, not an MK ultra victim. Hall, demonstrates consistent gatekeeping on all his subjects.
WikiLIES was a Cass Sunstein “cognitive infiltration” operation outed in 2011 by Webster Tarpley PhD:
https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2011/01/23/webster-tarpley-wikileaks-a-cognitive-infiltration-operation-video/
6) I linked to the Bartoll site in the numerology section. I do read it occasionally.
Cripes! Shrimpton is still about on that site writing articles!
Veterans Today? I do not read it. It’s one of only two sites (left unadulterated) that published the Tarpley article. It was originally on Webster Tarpley’s own site. But was removed.
Ross and Researcher here the post from P.O.M:
Link (also comments there are interesting):
https://pieceofmindful.com/2017/11/01/charles-manson-retaking-control-of-the-script/#more-77378
i give a snip:
“noticed about Sanders that he had a droll manner of delivery that has him going on and on without ever reaching a conclusion. In the PID stuff I decided that his role was to keep the juggler’s balls in the air, to never let the mystery be settled even as I made it obvious to him that it was settled.
I judged him to be a disinformation agent. His heavy exposure on the Hall show made me suspicious of Hall, who was also a promoter of the work of Dr. Judy Wood. I had not yet figured out Wood at that time, but that circle is now complete.
Since that time Mr. Hall has taken on the https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6owsiL9CpK8 a young girl who disappeared in Portugal in 2007, or so we are told. It has all the markings of a JonBenét-like psyop. It is the reason I ultimately came to conclude that Richard C. Hall is a disinformation agent.”
Thanks for this link. I couldn’t find it when I did a search on POM.
And here also link to the Benet case which seems to similar to MCcann (=faked). imo the commenter “TERRAN DOWNVALE” there is “on the money” (there are only 2-3 comments at the end where RDH is mentioned): https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/09/16/is-jonbenet-ramsey-now-a-fox-news-anchor/#more-77201
the shoe thing is also some masonic crap but also connects to either wizard of oz(os) or alice in wonderrland (or both) see my “Note” about LH Oswald on how important those are (alice and OZ)
and what is the deal with the 4 i do not see this as an “suspect” number at all and to ur last point, i have an interesting link for this sanders guy… where mark T (of POM) has a story to tell about sanders & RDH. post it later when time. hint was friend/guest on RDHs show but ran some damage control for the mason hoax :)) yes this web is spun wide even back to the alledged woodstock / drug murderers like man-SON who never was in jail :P GRÜEZI vom SCHAF
The red shoes are significant. I have an answer for Ross on that, and on the number four.
Thank you! Interesting read.
Zoroaster.
First two letters: “Zo”; reverse them: “Oz”: Lozenge, similar to “orange”, “o-range”. Ozwald.
“aster”: “Easter”, “Astor”.
An impressive post. I have to admit my failure in researching this more thoroughly. This has been an eye opener. I've had my suspicions of the Judy Wood DEW thingy and although guilt through association is in no way hard evidence, there is a connection between Wood, through Andrew Johnson, to Hall, which at the very least is suspicious. The exposure of the bomb hoax was already clearly presented by other researchers prior to Hall, and more thoroughly, it makes me wonder, why did he even bother. Very fishy.
Wow. Thank you. Yes, agree. 100%
Why did Hall bother? Almost nothing he did makes any sense. There’s so many bizarre contradictions and anomalies in the judgment pdf. I’d love to see the whole trial transcript.
Re Judy Wood and DEWS. I knew she was sketchy when there was an alleged shooting of her “assistant.” To make her work look important.
And this DEW psyop at the time was being heavily pushed in the US by Jesse Ventura on TV. Ex Navy Seal. Ex World Wide Wrestler. And ex-Governor.
There’s many papers debunking Wood’s book.
This is highly speculative, and expressed as a very speculative exloratory list of hypotheses, but anyway:
(1) MH's solicitors is Hudgell or Hudgell's or Hudgells.
(2) Hudgells assisted Alan Bates in the UK Post Office scandal, which received massive UK media attention and had its own primetime UK TV dramatisation. The scandal put the UK Post Office hugely in the wrong and the ordinary citizen contractor like Mr Bates in the right, if you believe the narritive. It co-incided with a decline in service of the UK post office, employee strikes, and later a sale to a person overseas.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt27867155/
(3) At the time of the drama Richard Branson gave Alan Bates a holiday on his private island. Why? I thought that Branson himself might have wanted a hostile takeover of the Post Office - and a one-to-one chat with Bates may have furnished him with information - but that takeover did not materialise.
(4) Controversially, according to Dallasgoldbug, Richard Branson and David Icke are the same actor. And their spouses look similar too.
https://xdisciple.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/image643_dick_dave1.jpg
(5) If you accept all of that, then the group controlling the actor Richard Branson/David Icke, gave Alan Bates a holiday, and Alan Bates who uses Hudgells solicitors. Consequently that group are likely at least neutral or look favourably on the causes taken up by Hudgells solicitors; perhaps there is a very much close connection.
(6) Hudgells solicitors defend - or at least accept - the official Manchester narritive of course.
(7) Richie Alan is a spin-off of David Icke - or if you accept some of the above - a spin-off of the group controlling the actor playing Branson/Icke. Richie Allen is also promoting some of the key areas of the Manchester narritive and criticises RDH's take too. This once again indicates that the group controlling Branson/Icke want to hold up the official Manchester narritive via Richie Allen's actions, if you accept the controversial claims above.
(8) There was a time - I think - when RDH both promoted and sold the books of David Icke and Lien Sanders - at least I think but I am not sure. And there may have been a time when the David Icke website may have also - at one point in time 10, 15, 20 years ago - sold RDH's material and Lien Sanders'. Although, I'd need some way of checking that and I doubt waybackmachine or similar are that good. So, is there a genuine fall out between "Icke" and RDH, or are they in league with this stage play all along? Also, I think that RDH and Andrew Johnson may have done a show - it might have beeen a 3-parter - on David Icke - but again I'd need to check to be sure.
(9) Paul JOSEPH Watson I believe is a spin-off of Icke and Alex Jones. Milo Yianoppolus (who worked with Delingpole at Brietbart) might be too. These two, in 2018, joined UKIP controversially when RDH-barrister Paul Oakley was in the hierarchy. i.e. Oakley at least tolerated their membership and behaviour even though doing that was accelerating the decline of a populist movement.
(10) So a speculative guess is that this is a small number of stage-players running in small-ish interlocking networks.
(11) Both "Branson" and "Icke" have appeared on the UK TV chat show "Wogan" at least once, with the latter appearing in turquoise (later to be the colours of Farage outfits The Brexit Party and Reform UK).
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13625480/
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13633356/
Oher links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Post_Office_scandal
https://www.hudgellsolicitors.co.uk/group-actions/post-office-horizon-scandal
https://www.hudgellsolicitors.co.uk/group-actions/post-office-horizon-scandal/post-office-horizon-it-public-inquiry
Yes, there’s a noticeable pattern in these legal psyops, lawyers and firms who are used more than once in staged trials and politically motivated media psyops.
Here’s an example: Another Keele University Crown Temple agent, Michael Mansfield:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mansfield
Jill Dando murder hoax. But take a look at his other high profile media trials and that’s an indication that they’re also likely to be faux and staged.
Curious News…cj Hopkins has won His Case in Berlin..what U and i also suspected top be fake
How predictable. People actually believed that Off Guardian hack.
“Award winning” playwright and author.
If anyone’s winning awards, getting books published and publicized GUARANTEED they’re part of a project and an intelligence asset.
Alex Jones and Sandy Hook “trials” in a ChatGPT conversation:
https://the-quash.captivate.fm/episode/alex-jones-sandy-hook-chatgpt-conversation
Just as an aside, CJ only reads 33 substacks. Just one of those coincidences ;)
Just a coincidence!
funny but fake looking pic… but nice article, finally a better “sum up” of these event(s). i mean mostly the RDH/BBC etc shillery as the man event was exposed long ago and Rich was not among the early exposers…
Here’s some Alice info if you’re interested:
http://www.allreligionsareone.org/Alice%20in%20Wonderland.html
I’m not disagreeing with your take on RDH, but I’m curious why MIri Finch has come in for criticism. Wasn’t she echoing your view in calling out RDH as an agent?
Sloboda Finch reinforces several frauds to do with the Arena hoax and the aftermath.
Firstly, she can’t have even bothered to read the summary judgment.
1) She implies the trial is real and the outcome. It’s not, it’s staged nonsense, so the outcome is literally a psyop and scare campaign.
2) The judgment against Hall can be easily vacated since he never saw or filmed Eve. His testimony is purely for self incrimination.
3) Any alleged claim of “stalker man” and the construct “Eve’s” knowledge of a stalker is actually as a result of being told by Hibbert and Gillbard. Why would they do that to someone who is supposedly depressed, disabled, suffers PTSD and has the “reading” age of a 9 year old?
4) The judgment transcript doesn’t explain how Hall allegedly got Gillbard’s address when Hibbert claimed Hall never contacted him. Since “Eve” is an alleged witness and victim in a hoax or an alleged ‘real’ event then Gillbard’s number and address wouldn’t be publicly available. In either case.
3) ‘Eve’s Law’ can’t be enforced and it’s highly unlikely Hall would agree to participate in setting himself up for future trial without assurances by the Crown Temple and his handler that they’d pay all legal costs and all damages. He’s not an idiot. Nobody who’s allegedly had all his experience is going to participate in their own demise, reputation and fiscal situation without a large monetary exchange.
4) Sloboda Finch claims Hall stalked a young girl, there’s no evidence he did that a) because there’s no actual evidence he was ever at Sarah Gillbard’s address, only his worthless testimony, and b) “Eve’s” a construct and not a witness or participant.
5) It’s only Hall’s lies about Eve and his own behavior on film where he incriminates himself needlessly, then lies about filming someone in a wheelchair with a carer and Gillbard, that he’s established the existence of a construct as a real person, and as disabled. At minimum if Eve exists, which I doubt, she was never at the Arena.
6) Sloboda Finch basically endorses the legal system as valid, with lawful authority and doesn’t bother connecting any dots with this or other hoaxes, just analyses Hall’s participation in the most superficial and false way, so the audience is still unaware of the purpose and depth of controlled opposition and the fraud of the legal system and government authority.
7) Sloboda Finch said Hall broke the story. No he did not. Many others broke it. It was common knowledge before he ever said a word or produced a book and video.
He was used by the Crown Temple to suppress the Manchester hoax dissemination, to taint all skeptics of state fabricated ‘terror’ as sick and delusional.
The Manchester Arena Hoax was broken wide open literally the day after by numerous YouTubers, and in the proceeding days and weeks.
It was done and dusted by the time Hall even mentioned it, so why is Sloboda Finch lying about Hall and his role?
Thanks for clarifying. You certainly have gone into the details of this case. I’ve got to admit I only came across the Manchester hoax through RDHs website, but there was a lot about him and Nick Kollerstrom I didn’t take to.
You’re welcome. I didn’t even look into this case until I noticed there were so many omissions by the group of four commentators - Davis, Hughes, O’Laughlan and Finch.
I forgot to mention something that’s key: The commentariat (or Hall) won’t bring up the “burden of proof” principle. In law, science and philosophy this principle applies.
They can’t all not know. So, they’re gatekeeping within the Overton window.
There’s many problems with Judy Wood.
1) She claims there were victims. The vicSIMS report shows otherwise.
2) The towers had been cordoned off for months by the Port Authority using barricades. Under the “renovations” pretext. There were no tenants in the buildings by the time they were stripped and set with explosives. They were all pulled.
3) There’s no nukes. No mini nukes, no neutron bombs, no secret directed energy weapon that can disintegrate or melt steel. There’s no scientific evidence on Wood’s side.
4) There was no dustification of the steel. All the steel beams were there and visible. There’s tons of rubble that took weeks to remove on giant barges. The buildings didn’t GO anywhere. They were destroyed.
5) Judy Wood and her “assistant” were in a psyop where he was allegedly randomly murdered by a marauding robber. An absurd, preposterous hoax.
6) She’s a laughable ‘character’. And trans. So that’s just more mockery the controllers are attempting to inflict.
7) The buildings were built visibly hollow. Many floors weren’t in existence, the elevator banks only utilized some sections and floors. Not the entire building.
8) The footage Wood used was falsified and fabricated, so her entire theory rests on faux footage and faux pics.
9) Judy Wood’s backstory isn’t credible. She apparently woke up from a coma of 6 years (3.3) and knew she had to become a professor.
The MO of the cryptocracy is to always provide at least two false opposition dichotomies (Hegelian Dialectic) to get people arguing about irrelevant nonsense. Thermite vs DEWS.
Or Lab leak vs natural “virus”
But Tim,
you miss the point of entire work & contents.
Here Researcher has shown you BOTH views of MSM & alternative poseurs is insubstantial fictions!
Instead of addressing any discrepancies , you have just gone & made a funny angry little dance, like eager freshly gelded pony in need of a carrot to chase for old times sake.
What is it about Judy Wood that we should take serious? I watch her & she is inarticulate, mumbling creature from deep sea trawling, is she from same hatchling colony as Psi-coco Op Petra ?
Hey Nushi,
I don’t know why but your comment is hidden.
You have to click on the comment you responded with to read it.
I was wondering if you can supply me with a link of any of her professional papers pre the 911 work. It is listed that there is over 60 on her bio, but I could not find any registered or available on the net.
Also, it would be reassuring to know what DEW can turn metal into dust?
DEWs do certainly exist as a fact & we can even build our own if so inclined, but none of the ones I am aware of can disintegrate metals, not even the ‘not always convincing’ work of John Hutchinson.
I am trying not to use the term dustify because it sounds child like to use, when disintegrate is a more proper expression?
Thank you for helping me see the truth of what you say on this Tim West.
It is obvious that you are worlds most useless & overt troll here tiny timmy.
Just looking at you is enough for astute observers to recognise abuse complex has shaped your miserable life in such a drastic way.
tROT ON Timmy,
you angry little maggot mule
Thanatos is your god & guide
But as you should be aware Tim I do not have any authority fallicies as I have never trusted them.
It sounds like you are again transferring your own repulsion at historic self ignorance , because of new fashionable insight you discover?
Please address my questions to you, before we get intimate in discussion here.
What you are doing is even greater fallacy game, as all of us who know of fallacies are well aware of by now. Usually I find people new to idea of fallacy have to over use it when decent discussion does not need such trivial analysis of fashions, or old tactics to get to meat of the matter.
The important issue is where is all the academic papers claimed to exist that can not be found? Please supply links, or it will appear Ms WoodPecker is an actress pretending to be more than she is.
Thanks for the nice words! I’m looking forward to the next major piece …
The dishwasher analogy is accurate. I have a newly written piece and it just needs to be tweaked, then installed. Just like my dishwasher still sitting in the living room. A stainless steel cube. A sculpture. The potential is there … 😂
‘‘The allegorical maintenance of a dish washer,’’ sound like very cheap, pre-certificate 1980s Horror film, or a Liverpool psychedelic indie beat group doing concept LP .
🙄🤔🤨
I must say you are very cheeky to discuss such things, I will never tell you any secrets again about household dilemmas. Researcher is very busy person who has no time to be indulgent with riff raff like yourself asking stupidness that is not your concern, now be off with you & go finish that MadJester Event symbolism essay you have been sitting on for many moons now.
🤭
I can’t reply to your Jew-dee Woods comments. I can’t even like them! Some psychopath got his panties in a twist after I asked him a question and then he blocked me. So I can’t even see or respond to that entire thread. Talk about a shit and run. 🙄
“I’m just looking at Jamie Andrews (I just realized it is actually Mike Yeadon , they are all blurring into one“
😂 They’re merging…
I actually asked “Tim” (the scientist he called himself !!! 😂🤣) about why Mike hasn’t mentioned that the PCR assault probes were obviously intranasal vaccination.
https://silview.media/2020/11/26/they-can-vaccinate-us-through-nasal-test-swabs/
He must have known as soon as he saw it, because I did.
That’s exactly what happened. He had a fit after being extremely rude, and then he blocked me. I don’t even know that idiot.
OMG that happens to me too! My keyboard freezes, on my phone. It’s only ever happened here. SubSchlock is definitely sub-par and compromised at the backend and the front. 😂 Much like that gang of BBC (MI7) gangstalkers.