Hall Of Smoke And Mirrors
“Believe none of what you hear and question everything you see.”
I’m diving head first into a controversial topic: Limited Hangouts, controlled opposition, masonic shills, useful idiots, useless idiots and those who won’t acknowledge faux, staged trials.
Recently, there’s been some debate between various ‘profiles’ on substack including Miri Ann Sloboda Finch, Aisling O’Loughlin, Iain Davis, David Hughes and several others in relation to the Richard D. Hall trial and ‘verdict’.
Hall’s participation in what appears to be yet another staged, faux ‘trial’ with a crisis actor from the Manchester Hoax, is almost a carbon copy of the Alex Jones, Sandy Hook Show Trial.
Other staged, faux trials include controlled opposition agents, Reiner Fuellmich and CJ Hopkins.
And the Nuremberg Trials were fake.
Courts accomplish this easily because every part of the so-called “legal system” is based on fraud.
Iain Davis and David Hughes have been championing Hall as a persecuted martyr in endlessly droll, multi-part sagas.
Davis promotes his own book and Hall’s on the Manchester Arena “bang”.
Nobody needs a book to deconstruct a hoax.
The burden of proof always falls on the govern-ment and media to prove their proclamations. That’s a fact these subpar ‘authors’ always omit.
Those who disbelieve hearsay are skeptics, not conspiracists. And rightly so: The government and media lie, constantly and consistently. Mass Media is a mind control tool not an information service.
Hall has a pattern of promoting blatant hoaxes and psyops:
Crop circles, space travel.
Animal mutilations, aliens, UFOs.
Mini nukes in 9/11. Judy Wood’s Disinfo.
Alleged victims in the 7/7 hoax and 9/11.
The Madeleine McCann kidnapping hoax as a ‘murder’ by her parents.
Claims of alleged dead (as real people “living abroad”) in the Manchester hoax rather than vicSIMS like in 9/11, ie; simulated, artificial constructs.
These represent a sample of Hall’s surreal theories - most devoid of logic, evidence or veracity.
Hall’s book and video on the Manchester Hoax evades mention of the #STRONG cities and towns networks and the RESILIENT Cities Networks managing the Greater Manchester area who conspire and create “terror” hoaxes, fake stabbings and fake crime in collusion with the faux authorities and ‘media’.
Resilient Cities Network was started by Rockefeller Org. Take heed of anyone using the words “resilience” or “resilient” be aware that’s a cult, cartel member signaling in plain sight their allegiance with the UN’s “resilience” strategy, which includes technocracy, mass depopulation and private property seizure.
The #STRONG cities and towns network is another unelected ROCKEFELLER and UN aligned org, that claims to combat “hate and terror”; the type only the govern-ment fabricates.
Robbie Williams sang #STRONG at a concert for the Manchester hoax “victims”, changing the lyrics to "Manchester we're #STRONG, we're #STRONG, we're #STRONG.
The #STRONG theme is used in most terror hoaxes starting with Boston #STRONG, Las Vegas #STRONG etc.
It can’t be overstated how crucial all terror hoaxes (including 9/11 and 7/7) are to the cryptocracy’s full implementation of Agenda 21; including bio-digital IDs, CBDCs, #SMART cities, #STRONG cities, #RESILIENT cities, orchestrated “war” and forced immigration, land grabs, increased surveillance, electronic fencing, online identify verification, loss of personal freedoms, medical freedom, censorship etc.
Other fraudulent NGOs like the EU’s Radicalisation Network are involved in ‘assessing’ these faux terror drills. There’s countless NGO’s and think tanks colluding in the Policy for Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE) scam. Including USAID (CIA) running hoaxes they design and orchestrate.
‘Terror’ drills co-coordinated by Rockefeller Org networks and local ‘govern-ments’ (mind-control) expose the motives and modus operandi for implementation of the technocratic bio-surveillance state, whilst gaining public acceptance for the worldwide, totalitarian and unpopular 4th IR pushed by the WEF and UN with their “You’ll own nothing and be happy” psychopathy.
‘Terrorism' is a false set of legislative acts used to pretend-prosecute legal fictions which ‘the state’ claims, unlawfully kill other legal fictions.
Davis and Hughes describe Hall as an “independent investigative journalist” and “researcher”. They tacitly imply agreement with all of Hall’s dubious content.
Hall’s background is textbook Intel asset. Hall worked as an electrical engineer at NEI Parson, RollsRoyce, on the Trident Nuclear program and for Joyce Loebl Ltd in ‘defense’. Meaning, he already had Naval Intelligence Security Clearance before he pivoted to tv presenter.
Hall’s tv show slot was with Edge Media TV, who broadcast as Controversial TV.
Ian R Crane and Brian Gerrish were also involved in Edge Media and UK Column, an obvious Limited Hangout and Navy Intelligence mouthpiece situated in Plymouth. Right next to HMNB Devonport
Hall, with his stag ring, green screen NASA CGI backdrop, his set sometimes featuring the black cube of Saturn, a pyramid image or other masonic symbology, using Freemasonic gestures in plain sight, offers weak, scripted, performative videos.
Marie-Hélène de Rothschild wore a stag head, while hosting a surrealist Ball at the Rothschild Château in 1972. Stag heads with antlers are a symbol of the cryptocracy.
Hall’s role served multiple purposes for the faux authorities :
1) Hall drew attention away from real independent researchers.
2) Brought attention to himself using obvious hoaxes long after they occurred, as a gatekeeper and Limited Hangout.
3) Promoted multiple hoaxes and psyops (listed above) as if they were real.
4) Gained a high profile in the alt media community through scripted, televised, widely distributed videos.
5) Incriminated himself unnecessarily in the alleged surveillance of crisis actors which resulted in a BBC Panorama hit piece.
7) Participated in a staged trial and judgment “Hibbert v Hall” resulting in a proposed censorship statute: “Eve’s Law”.
8) Tainted anyone who’s a skeptic of media and government, negatively influencing public opinion against anyone questioning terror hoaxes, crime hoaxes, pandemic hoaxes and mass media proclamations.
THE HARASSMENT PSYOP
In July 2021, Hall announced he was surveilling Manchester Hoax crisis actors:
"I've sharpened the spike on the end so I can just stick that into the ground in order to surveil our subjects," he told his viewers, holding up a camera attached to a stick with fake foliage wrapped around it.”
What clown with a camera would announce his intent publicly - supposedly BEFORE FILMING - to surveil crisis actors? It’s not believable.
Even more damning, the court transcript proves Hall wasn’t at ‘Eve Hibbert’ or Sarah Gillbard’s address. Hall lied to his audience.
“Richard Hall was shown on the film pulling up outside an address and preparing to secrete a security camera in the garden of an address which he purported to be the garden of the Hibberts and that he intended to catch them walking from the address.
DI Michael Russell and DS Claire Waring attended the home address of Eve Hibbert, on 21 July 2021, and were able to establish that this was NOT THE ADDRESS that Richard Hall had been parked outside when he planted the security camera in the garden on the film.” Paragraph 131 - Hibbert v Hall
Hall later posted a new video, where he claims “he did not put a camera outside the home of Eve Hibbert, but admitted to leaving "a camera rolling" in his van which was "parked in a public place".”
Hall admits he lied, but then claims he left a “camera rolling”. Where? Outside his own house? On a public street?
Hall’s statements are misleading and deliberately vague.
“Mr Hall later said online that Eve left the house in a wheelchair, but added, "There's no evidence" that the injury was as a result of the attack.”
Hall implies ‘Eve’ is real, has an “injury” and there was an “attack”. Three unverifiable, unproven proclamations.
Hall, his supporters (and detractors) repeatedly use the words “attack” “bomb” or phrase “false flag”. These terms are inaccurate and misleading. They’re drills and hoaxes.
Hall claimed he deleted the alleged footage of “Eve” in a wheelchair but in Hall’s testimony, he allegedly visited the Gillbard residence in August 2019, but released the faux teaser film of the intended stalking and “plant” camera, nearly a full 2 years later in June, 2021.
Why?
If he’d already deleted the film (as claimed) then there’s no need to release that teaser, except to incriminate himself so a trial can result.
Why would Hall mislead his audience about where he was, the timeline and what he allegedly filmed?
The only logical answer is to intentionally incriminate himself so a trial, and then censorship ‘laws’ can be introduced to protect these “terror” hoaxes and crisis from being questioned and exposed.
Since the burden of proof rests with the ‘government’ and media to prove all their statements - which are merely hearsay - it was redundant for Hall to follow, film or seek out crisis actors.
Catching crisis actors faking their injuries only proves they’re frauds, scammers, or possibly recovered. It doesn’t prove the state staged a ‘terror’ drill.
Crisis actors cast in drills may be chosen for their existing injuries. This is common knowledge after the Boston ‘bombing’ exposés.
Hall’s actions and ‘testimony’ before and during the faux ‘trial’ is what establishes the existence of the never seen ‘Eve’ and supports her alleged ‘disabled’ status.
There’s just one problem…
“Eve’s law” is based on a psyop emanating from a hoax, with a faux victim that may, or may not exist.
Constructs, i.e. artificial characters are commonly used as both, alleged victims and alleged perpetrators in hoaxes and psyops.
Damning evidence that Eve may be a construct and was definitely not involved with the hoax-drill comes from the Manchester police who - according to Hibbert’s testimony - asked for Sarah Gillbard’s (Eve’s mother) phone number - which they’d already have if “Eve” was a witness, or a crisis actor, or had even attended the Manchester Arena Hoax the night of the 22nd May, 2017.
Hibbert “went into Greater Manchester Police (‘GMP’) Headquarters to view the ‘Sequence of Events’ i.e. the images drawn from the CCTV footage of himself and Eve at the Arena on the night of the Attack (see paragraphs 19-20 above). While he was there, the police told him they needed to contact Ms Gillbard and asked for her number.” Paragraph 138 - Hibbert v Hall.
It’s not plausible GM Police Headquarters wouldn’t have all the alleged “victims” contact details for their faux Inquiry and Inquest.
These entire court proceedings and transcripts are farcical. Since Hall was never at the Gillbard address there’s no grounds for ‘harassment’.
Hall’s barrister can’t make that point, because then the faux trial, faux judgement can’t continue, or the proposed Eve’s Law.
Absolute proof of fraudulent, fake proceedings.
HIBBERT THE HUCKSTER
Hall also lied in his testimony about Martin Hibbert’s appearance in The Bill:
“As Mr Hall accepted in cross-examination, Mr Hibbert has not appeared in The Bill. He is not and has never been an actor.” Paragraph 123.
“Martin Hibbert” appeared in “The Bill” on the 25th June 2002. Series 18, episode 31. Vigilante.
Hibbert makes his appearance at 24:50
It’s the same ‘Martin Hibbert’. He’s 26 in this scene, with no beard.
Evidence of Hibbert’s 2002 previous acting role is in the episode itself, on IMDB listed in 2002, as “First Aider” and on a fan site.
IMDB uses unique identifiers.
More information on Martin Hibbert and major points omitted by Iain Davis and David Hughes are in my update:
The BBC disproved their own terror propaganda when they posted to the BBC channel on YouTube a film of this Police spokesperson (with a visible green screen reflection in his glasses) talking about the Manchester bombing hoax, posted during the day of the 22nd, before the Ariana Grande concert occurred.
The metadata on the Associated Press picture - shows the picture was taken 15 hours prior to the concert end and alleged “attack” - is more evidence of fraud.
Hall incorrectly states “those who were killed in the attack are really alive and living abroad.”
Nobody was killed. We don’t know if any alleged ‘dead’ from the hoax existed or not. They may all be constructs; vicSIMS. Death and birth certificates are easily faked by ‘the state’.
Hall, bizarrely missed 'Andy Wholey' on the BBC interview stating ”some of them were already disabled people".
Hall never mentions in his book or video that “Operation Plato” was running during the Manchester Hoax. “Operation Plato” was likely the code name of the Hoax-Drill.
The word “Plato” was obviously an allusion to Plato’s allegory of the cave.
“Operation Manteline” (Manteline is Old French for cloak) was the cover up, faux investigation, faux Inquest and faux Inquiry.
Can we seriously believe all Hall’s omissions, missteps, fallacies and misconceptions are a result of gross stupidity?
“Stupidity is a talent for misconception.” — Edgar Allan Poe
Hall’s stag ring, has multiple occult symbolic meanings, including St. Eustace's emblem.
The stag is an important symbol in ancient and pagan ceremonies.
And Cernunnos is a Celtic stag god.
THE JIHADIST CONSTRUCT
The alleged ‘terrorist’ (an actor playing the fictional character, Salman Abedi) caught on film.
DOCTORED PHOTOS
Pre-filmed neighborhood non-sense:
Pausing and posing for the camera, with the obligatory ‘hidden hand’.
DRILLS AND MORE DRILLS
Only the most feeble minded could believe this drill was an actual terror attack.
Video of Crisis Actors rehearsing for the Manchester Hoax in 2016.
The Queen’s visit: Fake “patients” in hospital without hospital robes, no visible injuries and no IV drips. Conversations with the Queen are awkward due to phony, rehearsed lines and admissions of a recent drill at the hospital that went like “clockwork”.
The Real Researchers Revealed
UK critical thinker released a series of videos exposing the Manchester hoax - 21st of October 2017, finalized 11th of November 2017; long before Hall released anything on the Manchester Hoax.
Within days, multiple researchers in the US had blown the Manchester Arena Hoax wide open.
There’s countless videos by many different researchers exposing the hoax the day after the event and in the following weeks.
TIMELINE - HOGGING THE LIMELIGHT
Hall’s 1st video mentioning Manchester was published on 15 June 2018, more than a year after the hoax was exposed.
Hall claims in a James Dellingpole interview not to really know the significance of 22.
Hall also claimed hoaxes - with faux deaths - only started “after 2013” which is absurd.
Hoaxes have been exposed by multiple researchers going all the way back to the Gunpowder Plot. The ‘spectacle of terror’ works as well as real death and carnage.
CAST OF MASONIC GRIFTERS
Hibbert with no visible shrapnel wounds. Legs appear to be normal.
Hibbert also received an ugly giant bee tattoo (a Freemason symbol) supposedly while in hospital yet dressed in normal clothing. Not plausible or possible.
Another Freemasonic crisis actor/grifter, Charlotte Campbell showing off her Masonic bee tattoo.
Masonic Numerology
“Man, 22, kills 22 on May 22”.
22 + 22 + 22 = 66 or 33.33
“With 22 shrapnel wounds.”
Titanium (hoax element 22) is also used in the nuclear hoax for storage of nuclear “waste”.
Fake = 22 Jewish Gematria.
Bomb = 22 Reverse Reduction Gematria
22 letters in the Hebrew alphabet.
22 Major Arcana cards in the Tarot deck.
“Ariana Grande was 23 years and 330 days (33) old on the 22nd day of the month with 22 victims.”
“That’s multiple Skull and Bones, Order ‘322’ references.”
There was a Masonic £300 shoe reference, the missing trouser legs, and Freemasonic symbolism in every photo.
Hibbert’s testimony contradicts multiple facts, never addressed by Hall’s defense counsel. Yet Hall calls his barrister “brilliant” and thanks him. For his incompetence and collusion? Or his astronomical fees?
Hall’s counsel, Paul Oakley’s office at the Crown Temple; Inner Temple address.
The Crown Temple, explained.
History of the Inner Temple shown on their website: The Templar Knights.
All government legislation is invalid and fraudulent.
The Crown Temple fails to prove its opening statement in paragraph 1 of the “judgment”.
“There are some secrets, which do not permit themselves to be told.” —Edgar Allan Poe
Update: I’ve removed any mention of a blocked, banned accounts with their unnecessary and trivial info after I cross linked them in my initial post.
Thanks to
who posted all the links and info on Martin Hibbert’s appearance in the Bill on fakeologist.com.Disclaimer : All statements are opinions based on research and analysis of publicly available information.
All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2025
Fantastic work! I hope that I.D., M.A.F., G.O.D. and others go through this line by line, stating where they agree or disagree and WHY! But I will not hold my breath waiting…
A few other things that I remember in no particular order:
(1) RDH's assertion that prior to 2013(?) victims were (or might be) real, but were not thereafter, seems to be a re-assertion of a hypothesis made years earlier by Ole Dammegard. Ole Dammegard (check spelling) was saying a similar thing in the late 2010s (?) BECAUSE - actually I do not remember his explanation exactly: It MIGHT have been that there is this CIA whistle-blower the late Cody Snodgrass and he asserted that claim, so it must be true.
(2) Ole D. also pushes the crisis actor phenomenon heavily, as does RDH, and others; contrast this with Dallasgoldbug's rejection of them in favour of "reality-based actors". The latter are one person going by different names and sometimes changed appearances in all of these events, sometimes they may be trading financial products in the aftermath of a crisis under and alias.
(3) Dallasgoldbug had a quarrel with Mathis back in the day about Mathis stealing some of his work, although the former's output is now awkwardly arranged and I cannot locate the link. When I read it, I thought that Dallas came out of it better.
(4) I did email RDH suggesting that the number "22" may have been a disguised use of the number "4" as is, for example, "13", "31", "112", "211", "49", "77" and similar; he did reply; but on Delingpole he said something like number coding of that sort was "the kind of thing that Ole D. would do".
(5) Blue slipper link is interesting. There is also something about "red shoes". There is a Kate Bush single (and album?) "The Red Shoes". The cOX event had red shoes on the floor. Westminster Bridge in 2017 had something with red or blue trainers too I think. And Twin Peaks s01Ep01 had a girl dancing across a hotel chequered floor with red shoes I think.
(6) Bartoll SE site is usually well worth a read. It may not be perfect, like much internet material, including my own, but worth reading.
(7) On another thread you or BSM mentioned that MAF or MASF or MSF was mixing Mathis into her work without acknowledgement. Now, she does know of Mathis because in her (first?) Delingpole interview she discusses their daily reads (Daily Mail, Mankow, etc.); JD mentions Mathis; she says "I'll have to check him out" or similar. That was circa 18 months ago! So more than 18 months ago MAF probably did not know about Mathis and her content was different, but since then she does. Since then all her substacking and "spooks faking their deaths" pieces have been created and pushed.
(8) Lien Sanders in his podcast with that MK Ultra looking guy who used to hang out with (ex-UKIP) Anne Marie Waters (Brent something or another - Lee I think) used the "hidden camera" and "stalker" narrative to turn against RDH and do the interview with BBC's Spring: But we now know the "hidden camera" and "stalker" are deceptions from every side and dimension of the story. Lien Sanders has not corrected himself on this point as far as I am aware.